June, 9 2016

(Bloomberg BNA) Senators Still In Talks On GMOs; Conaway Stands By House Bill

Senators Still In Talks On GMOs; Conaway Stands By House Bill
Casey Wooten
Bloomberg BNA

With less than a month before Vermont’s mandatory GMO labeling law goes into effect, Congress has yet to put forth a nationwide alternative, but Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said he’s continuing talks with the panel’s leading Democrat for a solution.

Roberts told an audience at a Bloomberg Government policy luncheon June 7 that he and Agriculture Committee ranking member Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) have about three key points left to resolve before reaching a compromise on a nationwide plan for labeling products made from genetically modified organisms.

Roberts didn’t identify which issues remained, but pointed to the urgency to create a nationwide labeling standard.

“This is so widespread and so important that this represents a wrecking ball to the entire food industry,” Roberts said. “We have to get it fixed. That’s the bottom line, and we are running out of time.”

The legislative challenges go beyond a Senate impasse. Vermont’s labeling law, which goes into effect July 1, could have a knock-on effect in other states, some of which are poised to enact their own GMO labeling standards. That could create a patchwork of laws among states, potentially creating a headache for food makers trying to comply with a kaleidoscope of new packaging regulations. Moreover, a Senate compromise to create a nationwide GMO labeling standard may get no traction in the House, where Agriculture Committee Chairman Mike Conaway (R-Texas)—who also spoke at the luncheon—still backs a voluntary-only GMO labeling bill (H.R. 1599) passed by that chamber in 2015.

Stymied Compromise Effort

Roberts’s effort at a compromise bill (S. 746) failed on a 48-49 procedural vote in March, sending those in favor of a nationwide, voluntary system and those supporting a nationwide, mandatory system back to the negotiating table.

That effort explored a voluntary system but with a trigger to implement a mandatory system if industry did not adequately participate. The bill wasn’t enough to bring over Stabenow or many of her Democratic colleagues, who largely support mandatory labeling from the start (See previous story, 03/17/16).

That leaves Roberts struggling with the vote math, trying to balance attracting more Democrats to a GMO labeling bill without losing too many in his own party.

“Many people don’t bother or don’t consider the fact that we have to count to 60,” Roberts said.

Read more here.


About the Coalition for Safe Affordable Food

We are a broad-based coalition representing the entire American agriculture food supply chain – from farm to fork. We are committed to increasing the public’s understanding about the science and safety of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and advocating for science-based policies that keep food affordable for every American.

WE’RE Active in Your Community


Check Out Our Media